Skip to main content
Back to all tools
SOC Strategy Utility

Agentic SOC Readiness Assessment

Find out how ready your security operations team is for AI agents. Answer 20 questions across five areas to get a readiness score and your next phase, then sort SOC tasks into quick wins and tasks to keep human. Based on the four-phase model in our agentic SOC roadmap.

Use ResponsiblyLocal Browser Execution

Only assess your own answers about your team's processes you own or have explicit authorization to test. This tool is intended solely for defensive security analysis, posture auditing, and authorized assessment.

Local Execution: Runs entirely in your browser. Your answers and task list are never uploaded, stored or shared.

Non-Destructive: No exploitation, brute-forcing, or state-altering requests are performed.Responsible Use Policy

1. Readiness scorecard

0/20 answered
People

Analysts are trained to review, validate and correct AI output.

Named owners are responsible for agent feedback, escalation and oversight.

There is an upskilling plan for analysts moving into AI supervision.

Leadership has agreed which outcomes AI should improve, such as response time or analyst workload.

Process

Core triage and investigation workflows are documented and followed consistently.

Decision logic and escalation paths are written down.

You track baseline metrics such as MTTD, MTTR and false positive rate.

High-impact actions, such as isolating a host or disabling an account, need a defined approval.

Data

Endpoint, cloud, identity and network telemetry land in one platform.

Logs are normalized to a common schema.

Events are enriched with asset, user and threat intelligence context.

Data arrives in near real time and ingestion health is monitored.

Tooling

There is a safe test environment for automations and agents.

Detection and automation content is under version control with rollback.

SOAR or workflow automation already handles deterministic tasks.

Integrations use least-privilege service accounts and API scopes.

Governance and AI security

Each agent has a written list of allowed actions, separating recommend from execute.

Agent decisions are logged with the data and reasoning behind them.

AI components have been threat-modeled for prompt injection and data poisoning.

Agent accuracy is monitored for drift and reviewed on a schedule.

2. AI agent task matrix

Rate each task by its impact on your organization and how hard it would be to hand to an agent. The defaults follow common practice; adjust them for your environment and add your own tasks.

Alert triage
Alert enrichment
CVE analysis
Malware classification
Investigation summaries
Multi-agent workflows
Adaptive response coordination
Notification triggers
Routine data normalization
Incident escalation decisions
Legal or compliance notifications
Attribution analysis
High impact · Low difficulty
Quick wins

Deploy AI agents here first.

  • Alert triage
  • Alert enrichment
  • CVE analysis
  • Malware classification
  • Investigation summaries
High impact · High difficulty
Strategic investments

Plan for these once data maturity and trust are proven.

  • Multi-agent workflows
  • Adaptive response coordination
Low impact · Low difficulty
Keep with rules or SOAR

Deterministic work is cheaper as scripts or playbooks.

  • Notification triggers
  • Routine data normalization
Low impact · High difficulty
Avoid or defer

Automating these adds risk without clear benefit. Keep them human.

  • Incident escalation decisions
  • Legal or compliance notifications
  • Attribution analysis
Paste it into an email or planning doc for your SOC manager or CISO.

Keep reading